Bill C32 must allow for lawful digital lock-picking

@TonyClement_MP @MPJamesMoore @CharlieAngusMP @MPMarcGarneau C32 protects digital locks more than US law, ACTA; but digital locks are not IP
[Retweet this]

@TonyClement_MP @MPJamesMoore @CharlieAngusMP @MPMarcGarneau C32 must provide for circumventing digital locks when for lawful purposes
[Retweet this]

Bill C32, the Act to amend the Copyright Act, has passed second reading and is now in committee. There are solid gains for fair dealing in Bill C-32, but they’re meaningless if the bill remains inflexible on protecting digital locks: the technological protection measures increasingly placed on media content and devices. (See this CBC article for a good explanation of digital locks and what their protection in this bill could mean.)

The committee debating Bill C32 needs to keep hearing from Canadians about the major problem with the bill–and about its simple solution:

The problem:

Bill C32 protects digital locks more strictly than current US copyright law or even ACTA, and this protection trumps the bill’s otherwise substantial gains in fair dealing for Canadian consumers and educators. Furthermore, digital locks — TPMs, DRM, etc — are not intellectual property and should not be covered by IP legislation.

The solution:

Bill C32 should provide protection for circumventing digital locks when undertaken for lawful purposes. (As IP law professor Michael Geist says — in item seven of this article — this provision would still let Canada meet its obligations to international copyright agreements like WIPO and ACTA.)

Tweet or e-mail the committee members, as well as the ministers behind the bill, to let them know how to fix Bill C32, in order to protect flexible fair dealing for Canadians. Protecting fair dealing, not digital locks, is what will keep Canadian industry competitive, Canadian research innovative, and Canadian culture creative.

Charlie Angus (NDP) @CharlieAngusMP |
Kelly Block (C) @KellyBlockMP |
Sylvie Boucher (C)
Peter Braid (C) @peterbraid |
Serge Cardin (BQ)
Dean Del Mastro (C) @mpdeandelmastro |
Marc Garneau (L) @MPMarcGarneau |
Mike Lake (C) @MikeLakeMP |
Carole Lavallee (BQ) @Carolelavallee |
Dan McTeague (L) @danmcteague |
Pablo Rodriguez (L)

Committee chair: TBA

3 responses to “Bill C32 must allow for lawful digital lock-picking

  1. Pingback: Canadians have until Jan. 31 to comment on copyright bill | Academicalism

  2. Pingback: Teachers, it’s time to flex fair dealing. | Academicalism

  3. Pingback: A “constitutionally suspect” copyright bill, to build a nation of criminals | Academicalism

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.